Sunday, September 16, 2007
last class
During the first few classes, I was pretty overwhelmed by all of the information that was coming to me. I was worried I was not going to understand what was going on in class and generally feel like I was drowning. However, after last class, I feel a whole lot better about things, and I have more confidence that I will be able to actively participate in class and have insightful posts on my blog. I sometimes have a hard time comprehending even the most straightforward of texts; so going over the reading in Barry really helped me. By the lecture and discussion in class, I understood that New Criticism is just a close reading of a text; there is no bias in this reading, it is just what the text is, and not what the text means to anyone. During this class, I wondered what the results of reading something like the Bible in a New Criticism view would be like. Would it even be possible? While reading the Bible through this scope, one would be able to appreciate the form and art of the text, but how could one read something like the Bible and not think of it as relating to anything else. I feel like it would be very hard to just look at the text and not see any subtext. Any opinions on this one?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Good point! Thought you might like the following quote.... In the Catholic Church, the Second Vatican Council (1960's) wrote a document concerning this, "On Divine Revelation." This piece seems to speak to your question: "To search out the intention of the sacred writers, attention should be given, among other things, to 'literary forms.' For truth is set forth and expressed differently in texts which are variously historical, prophetic, poetic, or of other forms of discourse. The interpreter must investigate what meaning the sacred writer intended to express and actually expressed in particular circumstances by using contemporary literary forms in accordance with the situation of his own time and culture...." (#12)
So, from a faith perspective, historical criticism can help us more fully understand Scripture. Of course, if we loose sight of the faith element in analyzing the Bible, we would also miss out on the depths of its intended meaning, too. So the two kind of go together.
If you're interested, the rest of this document is online at the Vatican website: http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651118_dei-verbum_en.html
Fascinating!
-Harriet
Post a Comment